I have been a fan since episode one of season one because this show is different than anything else on TV. However, I detected something in last night's episode that I hope is not shapes of things to come. Up until now the language used has been relatively clean, and I like that. In my opinion, profanity is a sign of a lack of intelligence, vocabulary, and imagination. Last night a word beginning with the letter "s" was used at least three times in this episode. Is Matthew Weiner attempting to portray the '60s as a revolutionary time through the use of this kind of language? I certainly hope not. Weiner can successfully create an accurate vision of the '60s without stooping to this level and thereby compromising the quality of this truly fine show.

6  out of 33 found this valuable. Do you find this valuable? Do you?    

Show Last Reply

For an in depth discussion of tonights's MAD MEN episode, check out:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/afterbuzztv/2010/10/05/mad-men-s-4-ep-11-afterbuzz-tv

We host one every week LIVE 1.5hrs after the show ends. Be sure to listen in and give us your opinion by dialing 347 855 8269! And sorry for all you East Coast people that it's so late, you can always download our archived show the next day. And let us know what you think by emailing us @ info@afterbuzztv.com.

Follow us on twitter.com/afterbuzztv

Our website will launch soon too!

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?